Harold Guynn V. State Of Ohio – Summit County Common Pleas Case Number Cv 2016-06-2640

Harold was convicted of attempting to commit burglary, in Stark County, Ohio. Harold wanted his firearm rights restored. After Wesley’s involvement and filing a petition to restore Harold’s rights; the Court held a hearing. As a result of that hearing, the Court restored Harold’s firearm rights.
Harold was convicted of attempting to commit burglary, in Stark County, Ohio. Harold wanted his firearm rights restored. After Wesley’s involvement and filing a petition to restore Harold’s rights; the Court held a hearing. As a result of that hearing, the Court restored Harold’s firearm rights. Read More

State of Ohio v. Sherman Barnett – Summit County Common Pleas Case Number CR 2016-02-0477 A

Sherman was indicted for felony theft from a person in a protected class. After researching the matter, Wesley demonstrated that Sherman’s conduct was not a criminal offense. The government dismissed the charges against Sherman as a result.
Sherman was indicted for felony theft from a person in a protected class. After researching the matter, Wesley demonstrated that Sherman’s conduct was not a criminal offense. The government dismissed the charges against Sherman as a result. Read More

State of Ohio v. Rock Bailey – Portage County Common Pleas Case Number 2015 CR 00324

Rock was indicted for two counts of receiving stolen property; two counts of forgery; and, one count of attempted forgery, and theft. Rock could have been subjected to four years of prison. After Wesley set the matter for a jury trial; the government dismissed all of the charges against Rock.
Rock was indicted for two counts of receiving stolen property; two counts of forgery; and, one count of attempted forgery, and theft. Rock could have been subjected to four years of prison. After Wesley set the matter for a jury trial; the government dismissed all of the charges against Rock. Read More

State of Ohio v. Megan Mullins – Portage County Common Pleas Case Number 2017 CR 00790

Megan was charged with felony drug possession, subjecting her to a possible prison term of one year. After Wesley took up her case; the government dismissed the case against Megan.
Megan was charged with felony drug possession, subjecting her to a possible prison term of one year. After Wesley took up her case; the government dismissed the case against Megan. Read More

State of Ohio v. John Wise – Belmont County Common Pleas Case Number 2017 CR 106

John was indicted with felonious assault, subjecting him to a possible prison term of eight years. After Wesley began working John’s case plea negotiations ensued. As a result, John was sentenced to probation and no prison time.
John was indicted with felonious assault, subjecting him to a possible prison term of eight years. After Wesley began working John’s case plea negotiations ensued. As a result, John was sentenced to probation and no prison time. Read More

State of Ohio v. Danielle Morrow – Stow Municipal Court Case Number 2016 TRC 07039

Danielle was charged with operating a motor vehicle under the influence; failure to control; and, marked lanes violations. After Wesley’s hard work and effort, operating a motor vehicle under the influence was dismissed with prejudice.
Danielle was charged with operating a motor vehicle under the influence; failure to control; and, marked lanes violations. After Wesley’s hard work and effort, operating a motor vehicle under the influence was dismissed with prejudice. Read More

State of Ohio v. Alexander Mastroberti – Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Case Number CR 15-593679-A (1987-1988)

Alex was indicted for felony gambling with a maximum penalty of twelve months in prison. After Wesley’s involvement on the case, the charge was amended to a misdemeanor of the first degree and Alex was sentenced to only two months of probation.
Alex was indicted for felony gambling with a maximum penalty of twelve months in prison. After Wesley’s involvement on the case, the charge was amended to a misdemeanor of the first degree and Alex was sentenced to only two months of probation. Read More

State of Ohio v. Traci Smith – Ninth Appellate Court Case Number 14 CA 0122-M

Traci pled no contest to dogs running at large, a violation of the Wadsworth Codified Ordinances. Traci was sentenced to seven days in the Wadsworth City Jail. On appeal, Wesley presented the case to the Ninth District Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals reversed the conviction and remanded back to Wadsworth Municipal Court. After Wesley demanded a jury trial on Traci’s behalf the government dismissed the case against Traci.
Traci pled no contest to dogs running at large, a violation of the Wadsworth Codified Ordinances. Traci was sentenced to seven days in the Wadsworth City Jail. On appeal, Wesley presented the case to the Ninth District Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals reversed the conviction and remanded back to Wadsworth Municipal Court. After Wesley demanded a jury trial on Traci’s behalf the government dismissed the case against Traci. Read More

State of Ohio v. Brandon DeLeon – Ninth District Court of Appeals Case Numbers CA-28566, et al.

Brandon was sentenced to more time that was permitted under the law. On appeal, Wesley argued this was error by the trial court.
Brandon was sentenced to more time that was permitted under the law. On appeal, Wesley argued this was error by the trial court. Read More

State of Ohio v. Jarvell Henderson – Ninth District court of Appeals Case Number CA-29090

Jarvell was offered a plea deal for a life sentence with parole eligibility after 25 years. The government withdrew the plea offer and Jarvell appealed. On appeal, Wesley argued that the text messages between Jarvell’s trial counsel and the prosecutor should be considered a plea agreement enforceable against the government.
Jarvell was offered a plea deal for a life sentence with parole eligibility after 25 years. The government withdrew the plea offer and Jarvell appealed. On appeal, Wesley argued that the text messages between Jarvell’s trial counsel and the prosecutor should be considered a plea agreement enforceable against the government. Read More

State of Ohio v. Danielle Mitchell – Ninth District Court of Appeals Case Number CA-29233

Danielle was tried and convicted for robbery. Danielle appealed. On appeal, Wesley argued that the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to convict Danielle and the trial court made an error by admitting evidence against Danielle that should not have been admitted.
Danielle was tried and convicted for robbery. Danielle appealed. On appeal, Wesley argued that the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to convict Danielle and the trial court made an error by admitting evidence against Danielle that should not have been admitted. Read More

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.